Strong vs. Simple

Which is the best, CSS or XSL? CSS or Cascading Style Sheet is one of the most popular and widely used styling languages since the dawn of “tableless web design”. However, many web design experts, as well as the many web design Philippines experts, have said that CSS’ functionality is inferior compared to what XSL or Extensible Stylesheet Language is capable of. So which is the best?

CSS vs. XSL

CSS and XSL are considered as the two primary style sheet languages which are used in the market today. CSS was formed when two styling languages, Cascading HTML Style Sheets (CHSS) and Stream-based Style Sheet Proposal (SSP), was picked by W3C from 9 other languages to form a single language. XSL, on the other hand, was developed as an attempt to bring the functionality of DSSSL, particularly in the area of print and high-end typesetting, to XML, which has evolved into a family of languages used to transform and render XML documents.

The Strongest Styling Language

Many web experts agree that XSL is much more powerful compared to CSS in many ways. According to many web design Philippines experts, the combination of XSLT (XSL Transformations) and XSL-FO (XSL Formatting Objects) creates a powerful styling language compared to CSS. Part of the reason why is because XSLT is a Turing complete language, while CSS is not. Because of XSLT’s functionality, this demonstrates a degree of power and flexibility not found in CSS.

In addition to that, XSLT is capable of creating content, such as automatically creating a table of contents just from chapters in a book, or removing/selecting content, such as only generating a glossary from a book. XSLT version 1.0 with the EXSLT extensions or XSLT version 2.0 is capable of generating multiple documents as well, such as dividing the chapters in a book into their own individual pages. By contrast, a CSS can only selectively remove content by not displaying it.

XSL-FO, on the other hand, is unlike CSS in which XSL-FO stands alone. CSS modifies a document that attached to it, while the XSL-FO document (the result of the transformation by XSLT of the original document) contains all of the content to be presented in a purely presentational format. It has a wide range of specification options with regard to paged formatting and higher-quality typesetting.

Simple is Better

However, there are several reasons as to why CSS is considered as the best. One of which is because the use of XML languages is much more complicated compared to CSS. The complexity of XSL-FO is a problem, largely because implementing an FO processor is very difficult.

According to many web design Philippines experts, CSS implementations in web browsers are still not entirely compatible with one another, and it is much simpler to write a CSS processor than an FO processor. However, for richly specified paged media, such complexity is ultimately required in order to be able to solve various typesetting problems. For more information visit to our site at http://www.myoptimind.com/

About The Author
Margarette Mcbride is a copywriter of Optimind Web Design and SEO, a web design and seo company in the Philippines. Optimind specializes in building and promoting websites that are designed for conversion.

The author invites you to visit: http://www.myoptimind.com/
Article Source: http://www.articlecity.com/articles/web_design_and_development/article_2478.shtml